I thought it kind of interesting and I've reflected on it since. We also observe that the Supreme Court refused to answer question four of the reference regarding same-sex marriage that the Government of Canada put before it. Finally—I'm sorry to take so much time on this—recognizing, of course, that these marriages right now occur in seven provinces, there is no legislation right now that protects any minister, priest, and so on.
As you well know, you are allowed a minute presentation. Brown, I appreciated your comments.
One: as with gay marriage, society has shifted its opinion on plural marriage. If the majority is willing to take the big leap, it is hard to see how it can say no to the shorter one. This would remove what many advocates have always cited as a major advantage of marriage: a single, simple legal act that creates a standard set of privileges and obligations.
Younger demographics are even more affirmative. Join overwho read Dr. Email it to a friend! Faith Needs A Foundation. Are we witnessing the destruction of marriage? Even today, when social disapproval of extramarital sex gives extra leverage to the monogamy-minded spouse, at least some people are in polyamorous and open marriages by less-than-enthusiastic consentacceding to the wishes of a spouse who insists on such an arrangement.
According to lesbian activist Masha Gessen, "The institution of marriage should not exist. Supporters of polygamy have more than doubled since Share this Article Like this article? In fact, why have "marriage" at all? If the majority is willing to take the big leap, it is hard to see how it can say no to the shorter one.
Hodgeswritten by Justice Anthony Kennedy, all but sets a precedent that could lead the nation down the slippery slope to the legalization of polygamy, also known as polyamory. Indeed, from the standpoint of history and tradition, a leap from opposite-sex marriage to same-sex marriage is much greater than one from a two-person union to plural unions, which have deep roots in some cultures around the world.
Legalizing multiple spouses, on the other hand, would immediately affect every couple by opening a potential door to new partners in the marriage. We will not be able to prove here tonight that God exists or does not exist, but we need to respect people's convictions. We lost the battle, I think, years ago when we started to liberalize the divorce laws and to make marriage something where you could just get in easily and get out easily.
Then we move to question and answer rounds. That's what I was trying to get at. Bill Siksay: Would you take a case from a woman who approached you saying the Roman Catholic Church has denied her ordination and she wants to sue them to be ordained in the Catholic Church?