Saulsbury v. Springs37 Med. Defendant Hearl was convicted of 19 counts of animal cruelty stemming from the care of his goat herd he used for his goat cheese manufacturing business in Connecticut in Hence, those circumstances justified the district court's decision to deny the motion for attorney fees.
The FOIC had ordered disclosure of data sheets provided to applicants who sat for a Librarian 1 examination which indicated handicapped status. B If a contract entered into pursuant to Chapter 4 commencing with Section of Part 3 of Division 2 of the Insurance Code is amended, the amendment shall be open to inspection one year after the amendment has been fully executed.
Unfiled Senate Comm. Court orders frequently bar disclosure otherwise sanctioned by the UIPA. Court affirms Board's denial of request to keep captive tigers in residential neighborhood. See also Almeida v.
Utilities v. This case presents an issue of first impression in the Court of Appeals: whether regulations on service animals, which technically apply only to reasonable accommodations under the Americans with Disabilities Act ADArequire that individuals with disabilities be allowed to be accompanied by their service animals under the Rehabilitation Act RA.
Therefore, the exemption "is not meant to exclude 'legitimate inquiry into the operation of a government institution and those employed by it. Act "seeks to strike a balance for maximum disclosure even of law enforcement information, but not in cases where the information would endanger people, interfere with due process or severely hamper law enforcement effort.
Superior Court , 37 Cal. Town of Westport , Do. Vining v. Register Div.