Recognition of same-sex couples e. Retrieved June 18, A police taskforce on the case was disbanded in with no prospect of identifying other suspects. November 9, Same-sex sexual activity has been legal sincewhen Law No.
State government legislative State Senate Special. The court said the Yes on 8 argument was false because instruction on marriage is not required and parents can withdraw their children. Because the appeal was decided on the question of standing, the Supreme Court did not examine nor rule on whether in their view Proposition 8 had violated the U.
State government legislative.
After the election, a number of protests were held against the referendum's passing. Despite these advances, there are still instances of what could same sex marriage australia history videos in Riverside considered anti-LGBT sentiments in the Argentine government and judicial system.
September 18, Archived from the original on June 4, Archived from the original on November 1, The California Supreme Court ruled unanimously on May 26,that the approximately 18, same-sex marriages that had occurred prior to Proposition 8's passage would still be valid and must continue to be recognized in the state, since the amendment does not state explicitly that it would nullify the same-sex marriages performed before it took effect.
Results by county.
On August 8, , the California Superior Court turned down the legal challenge, affirming the new title and summary, stating, "the title and summary is not false or misleading because it states that Proposition 8 would 'eliminate the right of same-sex couples to marry' in California.
San Francisco. San Jose Mayor